About CATL
CATLogue
Contacts
eLearning Development and Support (eDS)
Evaluation of Teaching
Programmes, Workshops & Events
Projects
Publications
Resources
Teaching & Learning Support
Teaching and Learning Month
Teaching Criteria Framework
Funding for T&L
|
West Report
Review of Higher Education Financing and Policy ~ a policy discussion paper, DEETYA, 1997. <http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hereview/toc.htm>
This document was produced by the Higher Education Financing and Policy Review Committee chaired by Roderick West. The terms of reference included a current review of the state and effectiveness of Australian higher education and of developments which will impinge on it in the future; the development of a comprehensive policy framework ensuring flexible and creative response to change and the meeting of the needs of key stakeholders; and the provision within the framework for different funding options.
The proposals focus on post-secondary education as a whole. The Committee’s vision for the future includes a fostering of lifelong learning, of civic values of democracy and pluralism, and of scholarship; the development of graduates who can play a productive role in an externally focused economy; the provision of access to knowledge and skills to industry and government as well as to the wider community; developing higher education as a wealth generating industry; and ensuring access to all who have the capacity to succeed in higher education, irrespective of social or economic circumstances
Six basic principles proposed are:
- enhancing access
- a national target of near universal access to some form of post-secondary education and to some form of Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS)
- maximising student study options
- decisions on location, content and mode of delivery should arise from the relationship between provider and student, not from administrative or institutional requirements
- promoting quality and accountability
– a focus on educational outcomes, accountability to students and the taxpayer
- maximising benefits of research
– to emphasise transfer of new knowledge and skills to the community
- cost effective community benefits
– accountability to the tax-payer that higher education is meeting the community’s needs in the most cost-effective way
- fair levels of private contributions
– expectation that it is reasonable to expect individuals to contribute to their own higher education costs, in such a way that is fair to the individual and the family.
A concern for the quality of student learning, the development of a competitive post-secondary education industry and national priority setting for research are emphasised as core to achieving these principles. |
|