UWA Logo
  CATL | Teaching and Learning | Evaluation of Teaching  | WebCT   
           
About CATL
CATLogue
eLearning Development and Support (eDS)
Evaluation of Teaching
Programmes, Workshops & Events
Projects
Publications
Volume 12 2006 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 12 2006 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 12 2006 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 12
Volume 11 2005 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 11 2005 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 11 2005 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 11
Volume 10 2004 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 10 2004 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 10 2004 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 10
Volume 9 2003 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 9 2003 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 9 2003 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 9
Volume 8 2002 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 8 2002 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 8 2002 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 8
Volume 7 2001 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 7 2001 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 7 2001 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 7
Volume 6 2000 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 6 2000 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 6 2000 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 6
Volume 5 1999 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 5 1999 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 5 1999 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 5
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(9)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(9)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(9) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(9) (9)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(8)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(8)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(8) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(8) (8)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(7)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(7)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(7) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(7) (7)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(6)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(6)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(6) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(6) (6)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(5)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(5)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(5) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(5) (5)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(4)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(4)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(4) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(4) (4)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(3)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(3)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(3) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(3) (3)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(2)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(2)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(2) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(2) (2)
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(1)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(1)Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(1) Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(1) (1)
Volume 4 1998 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 4 1998 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 4 1998 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 4
Volume 3 1997 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 3 1997 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 3 1997 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 3
Volume 2 1996 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 2 1996 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 2 1996 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 2
Volume 1 1995 - Issues of Teaching & LearningVolume 1 1995 - Issues of Teaching & Learning Volume 1 1995 - Issues of Teaching & Learning 1
Resources
Teaching & Learning Support
Teaching and Learning Month
Teaching Criteria Framework
Funding for T&L

Issues of Teaching and Learning, 5(5)

What's Inside ITL

Is this what the 'consumer' wants?

Several factors are driving the shift toward learner outcome-based education, including the fact that more and more jobs demand specific technical skills, and students and employers expect higher education to ensure that students master them. However, another factor is the increasingly competitive environment for both consumers and providers of higher education. Both the increasing demand for postsecondary education and the feasibility of technology-based delivery are making the higher education market attractive to new private-sector providers. Likewise, existing institutions are now looking to offer programs outside of their traditional geographically-defined service areas. As a result, the consumer of higher education (both individuals and corporate clients) can now choose from multiple providers. In this environment, being able to make some judgment about the quality of competing program offerings becomes critical. Traditional site-based measures of quality, like accreditation, are having a very difficult time coping with new network-based program models. Learning outcomes, as measured by student competencies, is the quality measure that makes the most sense to consumers.

Mathews, D. (1998). Transforming Higher Education: Implications for State Higher Education Finance Policy. Educom Review, 33 (5),48-57. Available at <http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/erm9854.html>

The Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning (CATL) invites reader response. Responses advancing the scholarly debate of issues raised will be published in the Web version of that issue.

Top of Page