|
Page Information : Peer review: teaching vs. research
|
This page provides technical and administrative information regarding Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning - Peer review: teaching vs. research. For enquiries about the contents of the referring page, contact addresses in the Ownership table, below.
For general enquiries please check the General Enquiries page.
For technical issues or problems relating to these web pages, contact the University Website Office.
Return to referring page
| Page Properties | |
| Site Name |
|
Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning
|
|
|
| Page Name |
|
Peer review: teaching vs. research
|
Page ID: 76089
|
|
| Short Page Name | Peer review: teaching vs. research |
| Description |
"While most academics express few concerns about peer scrutiny of research activities, they tend to be skeptical of any process of peer review involving teaching." (Taylor & Richardson, 2001)
|
| Keywords |
teaching peer review quot march http retrieved research 2005 process richardson 2001 between 1991 taylor university academic development while used dest.gov.au archive eippubs highered www colleagues n.d eip01 scholarship validating bernstein 1996 methods cedam public 1999 knox educational 1995 promotion weight tenure ball ramsden learning 3.pdf 1997 universities practice classroom aspects student activities evaluation rewarding recognising clarke toolkit.html margetson martin good education rrgt 6.htm see emerging caut pubs higher www.anu.edu.au www.autc.gov.au australian centre tend scrutiny concerns center work time emphasising links caution tendency however reality few virtue greater works publication self-evaluation academics peer-review goelman fincher understand difficult among practitioners consequently hightower dale fox.cs.vt.edu jeric wg1report.pdf materials springsteel loose adams pieces standards instead occurs almost counter title express territory status wholly private currency nor consensual neither door behind closed claimed assess institute technology should massachusetts questioned improving importance being effectiveness undertaken decisions range variously equal given systematically instance cases provide comprehensive collegiality tasks assessment collaboration culture useful formatively create design paper evaluations covered examining including peer.shtml www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz documentation answered nebraska-lincoln amp involving case p116b951748 grantnumber through www.fipse.aed.org grantshow.cfm benefits saying particularly improve help performance acquainted skeptical staff instruction effective must include included files valued perspective become highly connection array sep25 25358.html establishing newsoffice web.mit.edu colloquium address increase
|
| URL(s) |
http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/page/76089
|
| Source |
http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/page/76089
|
| Lineage |
Home
Publications
Issues of Teaching & Learning
Volume 11 2005 - Issues of Teaching & Learning
Issues of Teaching and Learning, 11(3)
Peer review: teaching vs. research
|
| Rights |
Copyright 2009, Legal Services, The University of Western Australia
|
| Site Management Plan |
Site management plan
|
| Page History |
Today's Date is Tuesday, 24th November 2009 |
| Create Date |
Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:55:33 +0800
|
| Content Last Edited |
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:16:42 +0800
|
| Content Last Approved |
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:16:42 +0800
|
| Next Review Date |
A review date has not been set for this page.
|
Return to referring page
|
|