“In summary, ‘[s]ubmitting work to an
international journal for anonymous refereeing by unknown
peers is still one of the best tests of scholarly credibility
in the academic world’ (Roberts 1999, p. 15).
Currently, most reviews of teaching are provided by students.
Unfortunately, they are poorly placed to review the scholarly
credibility of the practices they are
experiencing.”
Taylor, P. and Richardson, A.
(2001). Validating Scholarship in University Teaching
retrieved 28 March 2005 from
http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/
highered/eippubs/eip01_3/01_3.pdf
The Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning
(CATL) invites reader response to its
publication ITL. Responses advancing the scholarly debate of
issues raised will be published in the Web version of that
issue.