About CATL
CATLogue
Contacts
eLearning Development and Support (eDS)
Evaluation of Teaching
Programmes, Workshops & Events
Projects
Publications
Resources
Teaching & Learning Support
Teaching and Learning Month
Teaching Criteria Framework
Funding for T&L
|
The PhD … more than a research process?
|
Despite differing structures, processes and means of
assessment, the PhD remains a universally recognised and
respected qualification. While experience, publications and the
ability to attract grants are core selection criteria, those two
letters, D and r, remain the unquestioned prerequisite for the
vast majority of new academic positions. However, the differences
between national approaches often produce graduates with markedly
different skills. In the United States, for example, periods of
teaching, and thus teacher-development, are often part of the
processes of candidature.
The University of Western Australia’s model of doctoral
candidature emphasises research, and some might argue often to
the exclusion of all else. This situation is comparable with most
Australian universities. While this model has been thoroughly
tested by time in terms of producing graduates with outstanding
research abilities, the same cannot be said for other core skills
required of new academics today. Although most academic positions
entail a substantial teaching role, when exactly do doctoral
candidates build and develop the pedagogical skills required for
their future careers? Similarly, while many undertaking doctoral
candidature are no longer looking to academia as a career path,
is there a single professional occupation today which is looking
for graduates who have only research skills, no matter how
impressive they might be?
While recent mandates from the Federal government have focused
on Excellence in Research, they have also directly linked funding
to Excellence in Teaching. Economic incentives should never be
the only reason for re-evaluating our procedures, but they
certainly highlight the shifting role of the doctorate and may be
a useful catalyst for provoking a level of self-evaluation and
reflection about what postgraduate research degrees do, and
should, entail. One of the core questions is simply: is the
doctoral process simply about building brilliant researchers or
outstanding, well-rounded academics? If the answer is the latter,
then we need to acknowledge that the vast majority of academics
have substantial teaching roles. Ensuring our graduates are
first-rate educators as well as outstanding researchers will
ensure the overall utility and credibility of our higher
degrees.
Initiatives such as the Postgraduate Teaching Internship
Scheme at UWA recognise that doctoral candidature can be a period
which allows postgraduate students to foster a wide range of
pedagogical and communication skills. While the postgraduates who
are fortunate enough to participate in such schemes are in
excellent standing to enter academia and professional positions
more broadly, the question of embedding professional and
pedagogical skills as part of higher degree programmes for
all postgraduate research students remains one worthy of
future consideration.
|
|